By Leonard E. Read
"My thesis," Leonard learn informs us during this awesome booklet, "in easiest phrases, is: permit an individual do whatever he pleases, as long as it truly is peaceable; the position of presidency, then, is to maintain the peace." in order that. This publication is a vintage, compelling assertion of the political philosophy of libertarianism and assertion of the guiding rules of the root for fiscal schooling.
Read or Download Anything That's Peaceful: The Case for the Free Market PDF
Best ethics & morality books
In Goodness and Justice, Joseph Mendola develops a unified ethical idea that defends the hedonism of classical utilitarianism whereas evading utilitarianism's everyday problems by way of differences. His thought includes a new type of consequentialism. whilst, as is usual, anyone is engaged in conflicting staff acts, it calls for that one practice the function in that crew that's such a lot beneficent.
“Turn on, track in, drop out,” Timothy Leary recommended adolescents within the Nineteen Sixties. and plenty of did, making a counterculture outfitted on medications, rock tune, sexual liberation, and communal residing. The hippies preached unfastened love, promoted flower strength, and suggested opposed to trusting somebody over thirty. Eschewing cash, materialism, and politics, they repudiated the mainstream values of the days.
I would really say, Serenus, that there's as huge a distinction among the Stoics and the opposite sects of philosophers as there's among women and men, for the reason that each one classification contributes an equivalent proportion to human society, however the one is born to command, the opposite to obey. the opposite philosophers care for us lightly and coaxingly, simply as our accustomed relations physicians frequently do with bodies, treating them now not by means of the simplest and shortest approach, yet by means of that which we let them hire; while the Stoics undertake a manly direction, and don't care approximately its showing beautiful to people who are coming into upon it, yet that it's going to as speedy as attainable take us out of the realm, and lead us to that lofty eminence that's to this point past the scope of any missile weapon that it really is above the succeed in of Fortune herself.
- Levinas et Rosenzweig, Edition: Philosophie d'aujour'hui
- Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage (S U N Y Series, Toward a Comparative Philosophy of Religions)
- Action, Emotion and Will
- Truth: Engagements Across Philosophical Traditions (Blackwell Readings in Continental Philosophy)
- Refuting Peter Singer's Ethical Theory: The Importance of Human Dignity
- Ethics, Love, and Faith in Kierkegaard: Philosophical Engagements (Indiana Series in the Philosophy of Religion)
Additional info for Anything That's Peaceful: The Case for the Free Market
Were the Russians practicing socialism 100 per cent, there would not be a living Russian. Life goes on in these and all other 2 While state plann~ng of the economy, and the coercive implementation of the state's plans are more widely practiced in Russia than perhaps any other country except China, we must remember that the Kremlin is more and more disregarding its own tenets and edging gradually toward the practice of a market economy. Incentives to induce production are on the increase, and a significant acreage has been restored to a free market type of farming.
If someone were to initiate such an action as flying at you with a dagger, that would be an example of aggressive force. It is this kind of force I call strife or violence. The force you would employ to repel the violence I would call defensive force. Try to think of a single instance where aggressive force -strife or violence-is morally warranted. There is none. Violence is morally insupportable! Defensive force is never an initial action. It comes into play only secondarily, that is, as the antidote to aggressive force or violence.
ANYTHING THAT'S PEACEFUL But to accede to their "invitation" to vacate would be to pay. With your liabsolutely" in mind, you refuse. At this point the officers in their attempt to carry out the Court's orders will try to carry you off your property, as peaceably as possible, of course. But to let them carry you off would be to acquiesce and to pay. You might as well have acquiesced in the first place. At this stage of the proceedings, in order not to pay, you have no recourse but to resist physical force with physical force.